Humphry Davy School aims to make the examination experience as positive and successful as possible for all students who sit public exams. To ensure this, we believe that it is important that students, parents, and carers are as well informed as possible. The school will make every effort to ensure our students receive the best possible preparation and that exams are conducted in a way that enables students to achieve their potential.
The Awarding Bodies (or Examination Boards) set down strict criteria for the organisation of examinations and both Humphry Davy School and the students sitting the examinations, are required to follow them precisely.
We have included some useful information here, together with the official Exam Board notices to support your understanding of the process.
Please don't hesitate to contact us during school hours if you have any queries regarding public examinations.
Appeals against Internal Assessment of Work for External Qualifications
Information about how to make an appeal can be found below. Paper copies will be available on results day for students to take home, or a downloadable form is below. Please return completed paper forms to the school reception. Electronic forms can be emailed to firstname.lastname@example.org. The deadline for stage 1 appeals is the 3rd September.
Should you wish to speak to us about the appeals process, please email email@example.com or contact the school on 01736 363559 and we will be in touch.
Reviews of Marking
Reviews of Marking
Centre assessed marks (GCSE controlled assessments, GCE coursework, GCE and GCSE non-examination assessments and Project qualifcations) for Humphry Davy School.
Humphry Davy School is committed to ensuring that whenever our staff mark candidates’ work this is done fairly, consistently and in accordance with the awarding body’s specification and subject-specific associated documents.
Candidates’ work will be marked by staff who have appropriate knowledge, understanding and skill, and who have been trained in this activity. Humphry Davy School is committed to ensuring that work produced by candidates is authenticated in line with the requirements of the awarding body. Where a number of subject teachers are involved in marking candidates’ work, internal moderation and standardisation will ensure consistency of marking.
- Humphry Davy School will ensure that candidates are informed of their centre assessed marks so that they may request a review of the centre’s marking before marks are submitted to the awarding body.
- Humphry Davy School will inform candidates that they may request copies of materials to assist them in considering whether to request a review of the centre’s marking of the assessment.
- Humphry Davy School will, having received a request for copies of materials, promptly make them available to the candidate.
- Humphry Davy School will provide candidates with sufficient time in order to allow them to review copies of materials and reach a decision.
- Humphry Davy School will provide a clear deadline for candidates to submit a request for a review of the centre’s marking. Requests will not be accepted after this deadline. Requests must be made in writing.
- Humphry Davy School will allow sufficient time for the review to be carried out, to make any necessary changes to marks and to inform the candidate of the outcome, all before the awarding body’s deadline.
- Humphry Davy School will ensure that the review of marking is carried out by an assessor who has appropriate competence, has had no previous involvement in the assessment of that candidate and has no personal interest in the review.
- Humphry Davy School will instruct the reviewer to ensure that the candidate’s mark is consistent with the standard set by the centre.
- Humphry Davy School will inform the candidate in writing of the outcome of the review of the centre’s marking.
- The outcome of the review of the centre’s marking will be made known to the head of centre. A written record of the review will be kept and made available to the awarding body upon request.
The moderation process carried out by the awarding bodies may result in a mark change, either upwards or downwards, even after an internal review. The internal review process is in place to ensure consistency of marking within the centre, whereas moderation by the awarding body ensures that centre marking is line with national standards. The mark submitted to the awarding body is subject to change and should therefore be considered provisional.